Search results

The law also has provisions allowing NHTSA the ability to extend the timeline as well as reporting to Congress why such a system cannot be deployed by the timelines given.

As someone personally impacted by drunk driving, I'm all for things that can reduce it, but yeah, I'm in the same spot as you on the risk of unintended consequences and all. Part of their research seems to be do you even completely lock down the car or leave it in a limited mode (e.g. limit the...

P.S. They also are taking into account impact of not only false positives, but true positives where locking the car might be a worse thing.

The actual NHTSA release appears to address everything you mentioned. The main purpose of that Jalopnik article was to generate web clicks from people outraged by something. It says NHTSA took a "big step" towards something but misrepesents what that step was. They make it sound like this...

It gets more aggressive/faster/not-sure-how-to-describe if it detects certain types of driving, which will invoke performance shifting mode.

And also those people tend to be in a hurry to get back to Vegas to catch an evening flight home. 😂

So, for this to work, all of the following needs to be done: Since the rule making is focused on car technology, your phone has to be able to connect to these yet-undecided car technologies to get the information the so-called AI needs to make its decision. So, Apple and Google have to add...

This is the kind of comment I'm talking about. There is no current technology, the point of the law is to direct the NHTSA make rules about creating the technology. And it can't be what most people think of when saying the words AI, as that would require your car to maintain a live data...

I didn't say it wasn't a kill switch and I don't want one on my car, but I also think worrying about some random person in a federal office is going to personally see you doing something and remote power off your car is fear-mongering. The hacking risk from privateers is more reasonable concern.

This is all hyperbole. The actual rule is specified to equip cars with system to cut ignition if the car detects the driver is impaired or distracted (think: interlock systems installed on cars owned by people convicted of DUI) using some currently undecided technology. There is no remote...

If you're going to get anything to practice, it should be iRacing as the tracks are more accurate and pedals/wheels are the intended primary/only input device. Plus, its got the 2nd gen CTS-V race car. It's a bigger upfront cost, though.

My only track experience is iRacing (vestibular issues), but the corkscrew at Laguna Seca has got to be near the top of "what was I thinking" list. Turn left and hope the track surface is still there...

Based on the pictures, there's more differences than just inclusion of the supercharger.

It's the long block only, not a complete motor. The crate LT4 is $17K. LT4 MY22 Wet Sump Crate Engine - 650 HP / 650 TQ

I use the connection points under the hood. My C7 charger goes to the 12V port in the hatch.

Winter mats (floor and trunk) were dealer installed options.

You might be able to use a map file from this thread.

There is no general consensus because there is no right and wrong answer. Don't judge people for how they use their cars.

It's not confusing. The FAQ specifically refers to cars that come with LT1 and LT4 engines, which the 4BW doesn't.

The procedure I do for my Z06 is 1. Add fuel stabilizer to empty tank when filling up. 2. Drive until 1/4 tank left (specific to Z06 re: issues with fuel sending sensors). 3. Wash/detail car. 4. Inflate tires to placard pressure. 5. Plug in battery tender. 6. Cover 7. Cry until Spring. During...